6th Mar. 2012
Historically understood Shri Krishna was truly worthy of the 'avatar' status. His life and teachings point to Him as a princely Aryan and divine incarnation of Shri Vishnu. He was the hero of Mahabharata, instructor in Bhagavad Gita, and undoubtedly one of the greatest, if not the greatest personality in Indian history.
As it is with all famous personalities, their lives are enshrined by scribes of the day. With the passing of time, and more so in times of yore, artistic license was indulged to sensationalize history by characterizing protagonists as larger than life, e.g., Ravan had ten heads. Actually Ravan was colloquially defined as having ten heads because of his immense knowledge. Artistic license converted colloquialism into a portrait of Ravan with ten heads extended off one neck.....just one unhinged distortion among many.
Far-famed for his profound instructions to Arjun on the battlefield of Kurushetra, and narrated via a remote-viewer/hearer named Sanjay, Krishna's élan vital in biography was a quest for every holy hack with an eagle's quill. So it was that out of opportunity emerged a genre bender named Bobadev. This author had some standing as attaché to then Odiyan Prime Minister- Himadri. Seeing Krishna's involvement with history to be revered but fleeting, Bobadev, using artistic license as right, decided to author a dramaturgic personate of the great Aryan Prince. It is important to note here that although Bobadev compiled the Bhagavatam (Bhagavat Purana,) as confessed to in his book- "Himadri", he never mentioned "gopi lila" Krishna. The world first heard about Krishna's girlfriend "Radha" (approx. two thousand years after Krishna's death) in the book- "Gitagovind" written by Bobadev's brother Jayadev (both brothers born in Kenduli, Odisha- 11th CE) who was also a Member of Staff at the Chief Minister's Office.
>>In the whole of Mahabharata, there is no mention even of the name Radha. We first get glimpses of her, in Gita Govinda of Jayadeva, in the Bhagvat of Bopadeva (sic), his real brother and also in other literary description in the works like Brahma Vaivarta Purana, etc. One comes across in Brahma Vaivarta Purana the illicit love affairs of Radha with Krishna. In the same Purana also many contrary types of relations are alluded regarding the relations between them. Somewhere she is depicted as the daughter of Shrikrishna. Some where she is related as Shrikrishna's aunt (wife of Rayana, brother of Yashoda), sometimes as his daughter-in-law and sometimes as the sister of Shrikrishna.<<......but always married to someone other than Krishna.....an adultress, at least.
Egged on by the Odiya brothers use of artistic license, Brahmins from South India began quilling and adding "Krishna lila" to existing fabrications. Two millennia after the fact Krishna's 'consorts' or 'manjaris' were identified, named, and intimate details revealed: a Gaudiyawood Production method that scriptwrites a wet-dream and then ascribes it to an author lost in time. Why South Indian Brahmins? Historians have concluded that authors of the "Vrindavan (Vraj) lilas" were not native to Uttar Pradesh. "The Bhagavata was written by a Vaisnava southerner (who did not know the geography of Vraja at all). The Nambudiris are Vaisnava southerners." They described landscape and populace based on hearsay. Geometrics did not fit; location and events made no relative sense nor sync with geographical fact. Population, specifically bovine, could never be sustained in proportions claimed. Furthermore, and most telling was the language used by lila writers- glottochronologists have identified it as uniquely Nambudiri Brahmin (closest to the Sanskrit used by Rishi Vyas in his Uttar Mimansa commentary). When facts were added up (the distance between authors and location to which travel in those days was half-a-lifetime away) there could be no other explanation.
In competition with Jainism, a sect that worshipped deities, Brahmins also began producing images which, unlike the Jains, were dressed and adorned with ornaments. Not only did the Jains create a competitive atmosphere for Brahmins, so did the Buddhists (impersonalists,) and so too were a powerful sect of followers announcing Shiva as Mahesvara. To put the sect in place i.e., Vishnu was superior to Shiva, and in keeping with sexual stimuli of the times, Brahmins quilled this ejaculatory humdinger :
SB 8.12.17: Sukadeva Gosvami continued: After speaking in this way, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Vishnu, immediately disappeared, and Lord Siva remained there with Uma, looking for Him all around with moving eyes.
SB 8.12.18: Thereafter, in a nice forest nearby, full of trees with reddish-pink leaves and varieties of flowers, Lord Siva saw a beautiful woman playing with a ball. Her hips were covered with a shining sari and ornamented with a belt.
SB 8.12.19: Because the ball was falling down and bouncing up, as She played with it Her breasts trembled, and because of the weight of those breasts and Her heavy flower garlands, Her waist appeared to be all but breaking at every step, as Her two soft feet, which were reddish like coral, moved here and there.
SB 8.12.20: The woman's face was decorated by broad, beautiful, restless eyes, which moved as the ball bounced here and there from Her hand. The two brilliant earrings on Her ears decorated Her shining cheeks like bluish reflections, and the hair scattered on Her face made Her even more beautiful to see.
SB 8.12.21: As She played with the ball, the sari covering Her body became loose, and Her hair scattered. She tried to bind Her hair with Her beautiful left hand, and at the same time She played with the ball by striking it with Her right hand. This was so attractive that the Supreme Lord, by His internal potency, in this way captivated everyone.
SB 8.12.22: While Lord Siva observed the beautiful woman playing with the ball, She sometimes glanced at him and slightly smiled in bashfulness. As he looked at the beautiful woman and She watched him, he forgot both himself and Uma, his most beautiful wife, as well as his associates nearby.
SB 8.12.23: When the ball leaped from Her hand and fell at a distance, the woman began to follow it, but as Lord Siva observed these activities, a breeze suddenly blew away the fine dress and belt that covered her.
SB 8.12.24: Thus Lord SivaSiva became very much attracted to Her.
SB 8.12.25: Lord Siva, his good sense taken away by the woman because of lusty desires to enjoy with Her, became so mad for Her that even in the presence of Bhavani he did not hesitate to approach Her.
SB 8.12.26: The beautiful woman was already naked, and when She saw Lord Siva coming toward Her, She became extremely bashful. Thus She kept smiling, but She hid Herself among the trees and did not stand in one place.
SB 8.12.27: His senses being agitated, Lord Siva, victimized by lusty desires, began to follow Her, just as a lusty elephant follows a she-elephant.
SB 8.12.28: After following Her with great speed, Lord Siva caught Her by the braid of Her hair and dragged Her near him. Although She was unwilling, he embraced Her with his arms.
SB 8.12.29-30: Being embraced by Lord Siva like a female elephant embraced by a male, the woman, whose hair was scattered, swirled like a snake. O King, this woman, who had large, high hips, was a woman of yogamaya presented by the Supreme Personality of Godhead. She released Herself somehow or other from the fond embrace of Lord Siva's arms and ran away.
SB 8.12.31: As if harassed by an enemy in the form of lusty desires, Lord Siva followed the path of Lord Vishnu, who acts very wonderfully and who had taken the form of Mohini.
SB 8.12.32: Just as a maddened bull elephant follows a female elephant who is able to conceive pregnancy, Lord Siva followed the beautiful woman and discharged semen, even though his discharge of semen never goes in vain.
SB 8.12.33: O King, wheresoever on the surface of the globe fell the semen of the great personality of Lord Siva, mines of gold and silver later appeared.
SB 8.12.34: Following Mohini, Lord Siva went everywhere -- near the shores of the rivers and lakes, near the mountains, near the forests, near the gardens, and wherever there lived great sages.
SB 8.12.35: O Maharaja Parikshit, best of kings, when Lord Siva had fully discharged semen, he could see how he himself had been victimized by the illusion created by the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Thus he restrained himself from any further maya.
The trend to eliminate competition continues even today. Here is an excerpt from a lecture by Iskcon's founder, smashing demigod worship:
Lecture on SB 2.3.1-3 -- Los Angeles, May 22, 1972:
Those who are too much lusty satisfy simply... The most important indriya is the genital, sex. So for them, it is recommended that "You worship Indra." Indra, the demigod, he is number one sexually inclined demigod. He has got eyes, eyes over all his body. Sata-caksumsi. These eyes were originally vagina. He was cursed by Gautama Muni that "You are so fond of vagina that I curse you that you get all over your body vagina only." Then, when he surrendered, he began to cry that "It will be very much, I mean to say, abominable for me." Then he asked, offered, that "These vagina may be turned into eyes." Therefore his body is full of eyes. Sata-caksumsi. So those who are too much lusty, lover of the vagina, they may worship Indra.
Working in concert with descriptions of a newly discovered Vishnu who was risqué
, temple construction included carvings of demigods and goddesses in compromising positions. Devadasi' (women) were introduced as servants. The Devadasi' performed dances before the deities and congregation; not unlike dancers stimulating clientele in modern day sleaze joints. Their services extended to activities depicted in carvings on the temple face....sex. The Moulin Rouge
effect pulled in customers from all isms. Temples were packed to the domes and Brahmins raked in the profits.
Comment: After centuries of exploitation the Devadasi and Rajadasi holy prostitution racket was totally outlawed in 1988 by the Indian Government.
Sashimoni, oldest living Devadasi
(note hand gesture)
By Caitanya's advent in 1486, a mythological Krishna's carnality and promiscuity, albeit sotto voce, had morphed from fantasy to historical fact. Caitanya's associates chose to speculate heavily by gainfully proclaiming Krishna as supreme: the source of Vishnu. Caitanya was declared to be a half-Krishna-half-Radha incarnation, and Krishna's orgies with little girls was promoted as the highest relationship between God and humans- parakiya rasa.
So what began as employee's (Bobadeva & Jayadeva) attempts to impress the boss (Chief Min. Himadri,) took shape as fact and found its crusade in the Caitanya cult. However, although the cult flourished for awhile it found no great numbers in conversion outside Bengal (Gauda). It was not until three-and-a-half centuries later that a band of Bengali evangelists under a deputy magistrate named Kedarnath Datta discovered his-story via dreams, visions, unseen and unattested manuscripts to insist God had secretly taken birth in Bengal in 1486 and his name was Caitanya- The official Gaudiya (Bengali) Mutt was established.
No sooner had the cult re-entered the market than the peddling of soft porn (with Krishna as stud) began in earnest. Gaudiya "litterature" proclaiming the divine romper-bonker to be fact, triggered a Krishna lila pandemic that exists to this very day. "Krishnas" are still running off into the forest with "gopis" to perform "rasa lila" http://www.rishikaxcult.com/
Here are a few gaudiya titillations. Remember this soft-core was being pedaled when no porn market existed. The gaudiyas had created a 'no competition' adult peep-show using Krishna as pin-up playboy:
SB 10.33.22: Lord Krishna's garland had been crushed during His conjugal dalliance with the gopis and colored vermillion by the kunkuma powder on their breasts. To dispel the fatigue of the gopis, Krishna entered the water of the Yamuna , followed swiftly by bees who were singing like the best of the Gandharvas. He appeared like a lordly elephant entering the water to relax in the company of his consorts. Indeed, the Lord had transgressed all worldly and Vedic morality.....
Conjugal dalliance with the gopis? The dictionary defines 'conjugal' as relating to husband and wife. Yet it is commonly given in gaudiya litterature that Krishna was eight-years-old, and the gopis were minors, already betrothed to others....."Krsna enjoyed the rasa dance with the gopis when He was eight years old. At that time, many of the gopis were married, because in India, especially in those days, girls were married at a very early age". The information that his garland (not his shirt) was crushed and carrying kunkuma powder transferred from their breasts, tells the reader there was naked chest-on-breast contact which then resulted in the fatigue of the gopis....sexual exhaustion. If there is any doubt as to eight-year-old Krishna's sexual prowess it is hereby confirmed- Indeed, the Lord had transgressed all worldly and Vedic morality... Yet historically recorded, Shri Krishna's fame is rooted in morality and Vedic injunction. So how is it that an eight-year-old boy, hopping around like a bunny-rabbit in the forest in conjugal dalliance with the wives of his friends, ends up the most Aryan (noble) of all Indians?
Here are a few more Gaudiyawood corkers:
SB 10.22.17: Then, shivering from the painful cold, all the young girls rose up out of the water, covering their pubic area with their hands.
When we hear the contradictions presented it leaves us wondering as to rhetoric and intent. Were gaudiya pedophiles producing sexually stimulating litterature to excite converts/clientele and promote child abuse? Prabhupada (Iskcon's founder): "Anyone who satisfies her desire for sex at that age (10/11 years old) becomes a great object of satisfaction. It is a psychological fact that when a woman (a 10 year old woman? !!) at the age of puberty meets a man and the man satisfies her sexually, she will love that man for the rest of her life, regardless who he is".
Both excerpts presented are taken from Iskcon's translation of gaudiya quilled scripture. Now read this explanation, also from the Iskcon cult, which, unprompted by protest (!) attempts to re-right the obvious...child pornography: "As already pointed out, both Krsna and the gopis were too young for sexual exploits. As we have learned in a previous chapter that Krsna and the gopis were only about eight years old and had not even reached puberty." Where did the Hare Krishna founder get the idea it was sexual ??? And why are the eight-year-old gopis portrayed with large breasts, rounded hips and suggestive come-rub-my-kunkuma poses? This thought process (visualizing a child as adult) is a clinically diagnosed and identified pedophile phantasm.
SB 10.22.22: Although the gopis had been thoroughly cheated, deprived of their modesty, ridiculed and made to act just like toy dolls, and although their clothing had been stolen, they did not feel at all inimical toward Sri Krishna. Rather, they were simply joyful to have this opportunity to associate with their beloved.
What does this nonsense suggest other than child sex was practiced and condoned by Krishna? All this cheated, deprived of modesty, ridiculed, and made to act like toy dolls was carried out by Sri Krishna who, eulogized in Indian history- was an exemplary Aryan, and a divine incarnation of Shri Vishnu, manifest to protect the innocent and restore dharma. Instead Gaudiyawood pushes Krishna as a pedophile, horny devil. Why? Is it because child sex sells? Is it why the Hare Krishnas (Iskcon), today's foremost representative of gaudiyaism, are still in throes of dodging law suits involving thousands of child abuse victims?
SB 10.32.15. Sukadeva Gosvami: "My dear King, the gopis were always beautiful and decorated with confidential smiles and alluring garments. In their movements, intended to give impetus to lusty feelings, they would sometimes press Krsna's hand on their laps, and sometimes they would keep His lotus feet on their breasts. After doing this, they would talk with Krsna as if they were very angry with Him."
Pornography!! Not only was the fantasy of Bobadeva/Jayadeva used to establish a business that sold child porn, but when it was recharged by Kedarnath Datta, "manjaris" who had had intimate (sexual) relationships with Krishna began to secretly reincarnate within the gaudiya cult. We say secret because even today many Bengalis (gaudiyas) don't have an inkling about Caitanya or the gopi-porn racket. Anyway here is a list of Gaudiyawood "reincarnates". Please note, although the manjaris were all Krishna's stellar (underage) performing girlfriends...they only reincarnate as hairy gaudiya men. That's right. Not a single female among the porn pushers. Okay one- Jahnava Mata... Ananga Manjari. Here are the hairy guys who gaudiyas claim are really God's little pole dancers:
1) Rupa Gosvami... Rupa Manjari, 2) Raghunatha Dasa Gosvami... Rati Manjari, 3) Sanatana Gosvami... Lavanga Manjari, 4) Jiva Gosvami... Vilasa Manjari,
5) Raghunatha Bhatta Gosvami...Rasa Manjari, 6) Gopal Bhatta Gosvami...Guna Manjari, 7) Lokanatha Gosvami...Manjulali Manjari, 8) Krishnadasa Kaviraja Gosvami...Kasturi Manjari, 9) Narottama Dasa Thakura...Champaka Manjari, 10) Visvanatha Cakravarti Thakura Vinoda...Vallari Manjari, 11) Jagannatha Dasa Babaji... Rasika Manjari, 12) Bhaktivinoda Thakura...Kamala Manjari (His guru Bipin Bihari, claimed to be Vilasa manjari, but because he declared Bhaktivinod a liar his manjari status was degraded to tobacco smoker), 13) Gaurakishora Dasa Babaji...Guna Manjari, 14) Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati...Nayana-Mani Manjari, 15) A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada ----- Manjari. Note the dashes beside the name of A.C Bhaktivedanta, founder of Iskcon. They know he is a manjari...just waiting on a dream to confirm it.
BIF is not the forerunner in this probe. Certainly not! Stalwart supporters of Shri Krishna, Hindu champions of the TRUTH, Rishis and Maharishis, immortalized in song and verse, have identified and exposed Gaudiyawood "personalism" which claims divine reincarnation and validation via dreams (bhagavati) as a scam for profit. One such noted Hindu honored to this day in the Indian sub-continent is a Bengali named Rishi Bankim Chandra Chattopadhayay (27th June 1838- 8th April 1894). He was active in the same era as the gaudiya testator- Kedarnath Datta (aka. Bhaktivinod Thakur).
Though cutting Krishna down to purely human proportions, Bankim defended the hero's character and blamed the entirely fictional accretion squarely on the shoulders of the gaudiya cult and Caitanya movement, arguing that the cult was responsible for the effiminization of Bengali citizenry. At about the same time Bhaktivinod Thakur was associating with missionaries of British Christian origins. They were altogether different from the previous Muslim rulers who had no problem with child-sex abuse. It was commonly known and accepted by Muslims that prophet Mohammed married a six-year-old girl and then consummated his marriage when she was nine- "It is difficult to accept that the Holy Prophet married Aisha when she was 6-years-old and consummated his marriage with her when she was 9. He was then, 54 years old." http://www.faithfreedom.org/Articles/sina/ayesha.htm Bunkim debated and pushed relentlessly for a return to pure Hinduism free of inventions, gaudiya interpolations and sexual imagery. Simultaneously the stiff upper-lip Christian missionaries of the new British rule, viewed gaudiya vaisnavism as self-evident sexual immorality.
Impressed by Christian Missionaries and very much a servant to his new British sahebs, Bhaktivinod sought a diplomatic approach to the 'immorality' issue through process that would appease critics and in-fighters who feared that dreams (bhagavati- sajhayaism) were leading them astray from tradition. To this end he penned endless propaganda aimed at revamping gaudiya marketing strategies i.e., Krishna/gopi porn. He shifted focus to Caitanya: a complete biography in trilogy emphasizing celibacy, and the appreciation of Krishna/gopi orgies via higher devotional understanding, which concomittantly pressed home the gaudiya superior 'personalist' psyche.
Prior to Bhaktivinod, Bengali (or gaudiya) books were short, quick reads (choto kathar). It is interesting to note in Bhaktivinod's quotes below how when he first received a copy of Caitanya Charitamrita, he read it twice before understanding- no pandit was the equal of Chaitanya Mahaprabhu. Yet there was a doubt [in my mind to the effect] that - being this sort of pandit,..... to Bhaktivinod Caitanya was no more than a pandit. But after Bhaktivinod's literal involvement with the biography of the saint, what emerged was a verbose history (referencing unattested and unwitnessed manuscripts) claiming- Caitanya Mahaprabhu was a joint incarnation of Krishna and his consort Radha who had manifested to explain away the improper character of Krishna.
244. ....[....]....On my first reading of Chaitanya Charitamrita I developed a little faith in Sri Chaitanya.
245. On the second reading I understood that no pandit was the equal of Chaitanya Mahaprabhu. Yet there was a doubt [in my mind to the effect] that - being this sort of pandit, and having revealed the reality of love to such a degreee, how is it that He recomends the worship of the improper character of Krishna?
To endorse the 'incarnated' theory Bhaktivinod pointed to the Vedas as proof of prediction. From the Atharva Veda, he presented this- ito 'ham krita-sannyaso 'vatarisyami. In this verse the Supreme states: "I will descend as a sannyasi, a tall, fair, and saintly brahmana devotee, after four to five thousand years of Kali-yuga have passed. I will appear on earth near the Ganges shore...[...]...." From the Sama Veda, he presented this- tathaham krita-sannyaso bhu-girbanah avatarisye, the Supreme Being says that He will descend to earth as a brahmana-sannyasi at a place on the shore of the Ganges. From the Mundaka Upinashad 3.3, he translated thus: "When one realizes the golden form of Lord Gauranga, who is the ultimate actor and the source of the Supreme Brahman, he attains the highest knowledge. He transcends both pious and impious activities, becomes free from worldly bondage, and enters the divine abode of the Lord."
BIF is still waiting on a complete report from Vedantists on matters gaudiya, but we did receive verification on these particular quotes from our Vedaratna and Vedalankhar associates in India. In regards to the first two quotes we were informed that Shri Visnu made no predictions in the Vedas as to incarnations or reincarnations. Furthermore it has been noted these 'predictions' come with no text numbers or solid reference. Even so, language attributed to the Vedas is a cocktail of pidgin Sanskrit and Bengali; much like what an improperly educated student may use. Bhaktivinod (from his biography) : 265. I did not have much skill in Sanskrit grammar. 266. Little by little I began to write in Sanskrit myself.
As for the third 'prediction', we were reminded that the word "gauranga" is Bengali. Such a word cannot be found anywhere in ancient Sanskrit texts. Nevertheless, our consultants proceeded to translate the specified Mundaka Upinashad text, word-for-word Sanskrit to English for our readers. Here it is, along with a short conclusion:
Here is what Maharshi Mukundaka wrote on 3.3, with exact word for word translation: "When the seer sees the gold coloured Maker, powerful one, person, source of brahman, Knowing him, he shakes off good and evil; Stainless, he reaches supreme equality."
The colour gold represents purity. It basically states thst the creator is the purest of the pure, like the colour of gold. It has nothing to do with anyone called Caitanya. Also please bear in mind, God has never made mention of incarnations. No such terminology is used in the Vedas. Nor does the word Gauranga appear in Vedic texts. It is a Bengali word. Your author- Bhaktivinod, does not give any reference to text or text numbers of his Vedic translations. Anyone connected to study of the Vedas will instantly understand that these mantras or shlokas are Bengali mixed with an uneducated understanding of Sanskrit grammar.
Bhaktivinod did, by writing prolifically and forming various sangas and Nama Hatta programs, divert attention from gaudiya child porn to Caitanya as "Golden Avatar". However, the methodology he used to establish this diversion caused schisms within the ranks of a cult with no influence outside Bengal and Orissa (where Bhaktivinod's work as British appointed tax collector and deputy magistrate had some official authority). Our article "BhaktiviNO Thakur" posted on this site explains briefly the denunciation of his techniques by his own guru and clan. Nonetheless, by his death in June 23, 1914, Bhaktivinod had succeeded in the diversion but left his newly founded gaudiya 'Caitanya Movement' with severe cracks and a shaky infrastructure.
Bhaktisiddhanta Saraswati (BS) (aka. Bimal Prasad Datta,) the son of Bhaktivinod, took up the mantle of gaudiya leader after the death of his father. His immediate duty was to defend his father's failing reputation from attacks on all sides and simultaneously create a diversion (yet again) from in-fighting that was quickly decimating the gaudiyas. To fulfill his mission BS created two strategies 1) He went on the attack. Challenging gaudiya and babajis to debate, he pushed and bullied anyone and everyone in the Krishna/gopi belief system who defied his father's assertions or the 'Caitanya Avatar' declarations. He also took time to cross the street and accost anyone who was identified as an 'impersonalist'. 2) He institutionalized gaudiyaism by establishing his first mutt at Bagh Bazaar in Ultadanga, Bengal. Like his father before him, BS' tactics paid off earning him the reputation of "Shima" (lion). Yet he was accused of preaching sahajiyaism, reading from tear-jerker litterature, and presenting bhagavati as fact to elevate his status, command respect, and evoke sentiments. Even his brother, Lalit Prasad walked away from the establishment. Just as his father before him, BS' tactics were aggressively successful but proved ineffectual after his death. His claim to initiation by Gaur Kishore Das Babaji which he said happened in a dream, and his 'sannyas' initiation which he gave himself sitting before a mirror, did not go down well. The end result was, once again, a cause for serious doubt and schism:
"Ananta Vasudeva, elected as acarya after the death of Bhaktisiddhanta, considering Bipin Bihari's rejection of Bhaktivinod and also the irrational claims made by Bhaktisiddhanta as to both his initiations, came to conclusion that the parampara of Bhaktisiddhanta was not bona fide. After he came to this conclusion, he instructed the gaudiya sannyasis to go home and get married. He then renounced his sannyas and also his initiation from Bhaktisiddhanta Saraswati".
From the quickly fading ranks of gaudiya dreamers emerged another dreamer. He, from historical accounts, had an altercation with his wife who traded his precious Bhagavatam for tea. In a fit of rage he challenged his wife (of five births and several miscarriages)- "Tea or me?" They say a woman knows the worth of her man...She chose tea. He deserted her and the kids, marched off and had...a dream. No no, not a Krishna/gopi dream. He dreamt he saw his guru Bhaktisiddhanta calling him and instructing he take sannyas, which he did.
Garbed in saffron cloth and carrying a loosely translated Bhagavatam under his arm, the new acarya of gaudiyaism- A.C.Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada (ACBS,) headed for the American market, far away from India, to a place where hippies ruled and no one had a clue to clue about gaudiya sales and services. From the very beginning of his sojourn into the foreign marketplace, ACBS, just like Bhaktivinod and Bhaktisiddhanta before him, knew a) the Krishna/gopi porn sell must be softened by manipulation or the consequences could prove dire, and b) gaudiya history, its controversies and schisms must be nullified and separated from his newly instituted- ISKCON.
To deal with a) He directly instructed his foreign recruits to avoid reading the tenth canto of Srimad Bhagavatam (Krishna/gopi nookie) which he instructed was beyond the understanding of neophytes. To read the tenth canto, he directed that one must progress by first reading and understanding the first nine cantos. To comply with this dictate simultaneously with other constitutional directives would take a time-strapped student years to complete. Including ACBS' excessively lengthy purports, the once dramaturgic presentation of Bobadeva's Bhagavatam, had transformed into a bloated Prabhupadatam.
Nevertheless, and in spite of his attempts to mitigate the 'pedophile parampara' image of his Iskcon cult, he was unsuccessful. Bhavananda, one of ACBS' favorite disciples was caught in a barn in Mayapur (Bengal) having sex with an under aged boy. When the matter was reported to ACBS he did not turn the pedophile over to police as he should have. As far as he was concerned no crime had been committed. After all, ACBS when twenty-two-years-old, impregnated a girl of eleven. Prabhupada: "I was married, my wife was eleven years. I was 22 years. She did not know what is sex, eleven years girl......But after the first menstruation, the husband is ready. This is the system". We have heard the protests of ACBS supporters claiming he had no idea about the Bhavananda episode. To enlighten them we present this excerpt transcribed from a conversation held in Vrindavan (1977) just before ACBS passed on (available from Iskcon BBT):
ACBS: Aar eyi Bhavananda, recently ki safai koreche akebare.
Trans: And this Bhavananda has done so much cleaning recently
KDB: Bhagaban dekhben.
Trans: God will watch over
ACBS: Aakhere ghushkhora...
Trans: In the end it is...
ACBS: Loke gaye thuk thuk diyeche.
Trans: People have spat and spat on his body.
So why were the people (locals) spitting and spitting on the body of Bhavananda? If ACBS knew about the spitting, don't you think he would have known why... and why did he feel no compulsion to initiate police protection....and why did he send Bhavananda down the Ganges on a boat to escape the flying saliva...and why did this extremely relevant incident fade into insignificance never to raise its head again?
In dealing with b) ACBS cut all ties with the tattered gaudiya institution left by his guru Bhaktisiddhanta. He made certain no stray Indian in-the-know would undermine his institution by revealing dormant history to new votaries or media. To pre-empt the possibility, he internally preached against his gaudiya godbrothers and publicly severed all ties with the Indian community and Hinduism. ACBS presented his ISKCON as pristine. And last, but certainly not least, he shifted focus ever so gently from 'pedophile lilas' to 'devotional service' or distribution of his books which proclaimed unabashedly that "Guru-equals-God". In explanation we offer a brief analysis from ACBS' purports of the first two chapters of his Bhagavad Gita As It Is, to highlight his guru-equals-god strategy:
Bhagavad-gita is the widely read theistic science summarized in the Gita-mahatmya (Glorification of the Gita). There it says that one should read Bhagavad-gita very scrutinizingly with the help of a person who is a devotee of Sri Krsna and try to understand it without personally motivated interpretations.
Whatever the Gita-mahatmaya says, however long ago it was written, and by whomsoever wrote it, the "Glorification" was not in praise of Iskcon's Bhagavad Gita As It Is. Yet A.C.Bhaktivedanta, deceptively and ambiguously uses Gita-mahatmaya as praise and authentication for his translation and promotion of his own authorship.
The impersonalists cannot account for the senses of living enteties and therefore they are always anxious to describe all living enteties as senseless.
Rhetoric promoting (my guru is better than yours) division between cult and competition is prevelant within all indoctrinating texts compiled by A.C.Bhaktivedanta Prabhupada. Above we see how competitors are set up as targets to be shot down by cult adherents. Without actually naming Buddhists, the word 'impersonalists' applies to them. The conflict between 'personalists' (gaudiyas who claim to know God personally) and 'impersonalists' originated centuries ago when competition for votaries was a heated affair. Historians believe the gaudiya cult originated in retaliation to the Buddhist threat. In the Caitanya Caritamrta an altercation is recorded between Caitanya (proclaimed God by the gaudiya cult) and Buddhist monks. In translation of the text it becomes painfully clear that both God and the gaudiyas see Buddhists as spiritually inferior. Pursuing facts in relevance to the quote above we ask- "Who is Prabhupada referring to when he says- "...cannot account for the senses of living entities.........therefore they are always anxious to describe all living entities as senseless?" Who are "they", and where outside gaudiyaganda can we find a shred of evidence to support this bizarre statement?
He (God) takes great pleasure in His pure devotee assuming the advantageous position of odering Him than He does in being the giver of orders.....when He finds that a pure devotee is ordering Him, He takes transcendental pleasure.
Just prior to his demise, ACBS, when in discussion with his secretary Tamal Krishna Goswami said: "Problem is there is no brain." Smelting the statements together yields an alloy of the ACBS mind-set. As far as he was concerned there was no "pure devotee" other than himself. As such he was declaring himself God's director and his own utterings as credo: gospel for a world in genuflection. Ironically, Iskcon labels anyone who believes in oneness with God as an 'impersonalist', but here we see gaudiya hypocrisy in the use of oneness and difference to claim oneself supreme, i.e. guru-equals-god; a gaudiya forged license to merge man with God...god-man. Back-door impersonalism. In its quest to brand everyone else an ass, the Iskcon cult offers two carrots:- "Anyone can be guru" and "guru- equals-God". Taken together it is cult sanctioned impersonalism.
It is said that two kinds of men, namely the ksatriya who dies directly in front of the battlefield under Krsnas personal orders and the person in the renounced order of life who is absolutely devoted to spiritual culture, are eligible to enter into the sun globe, which is so powerful and dazzling.
Knowledge in this area of "Easy journey to other planets" is reserved for the abracadabra gaudiya. Remember, the author insisted the sun travels (not the planets) around the welkin @ 16,004 miles per nano second. What to speak of other planets, as pointed out earlier, gaudiyas had a geographical problem with the tiny village of Vrindavan. As we will show in our upcoming article- "5th on the 5th", there are gross mistakes and exaggerations in gaudiya calculations regarding our planet Earth. We believe the absurdities to have stemmed from a willful attempt to deceive believers into accepting gaudiyaism as being in a 'personal relationship' with God. How else could anyone (eight centuries ago) claim possession of intergalactic knowledge? These barmy swamis and porn-peddling-pundits made no concession for advancement of man, science,...orbiting satellites and the Hubble Telescope.
What can be said in relation to the quote above is that Iskcon does not have the numbers to consider world domination by force- Prabhupada: "Kill them. Finish. Just like Parasurama did. Kill all them, twenty-one times". Should the cult be allowed to grow, the carrying out of such 'personal orders' may slaughter the world into belief- Prabhupada: "I like this position, dictatorship. Personally I like this". However, as it is, the rhetoric directs 'ksatriyas' (fighters) to die under Krsna's personal orders or ACBS' orders really (he orders God, remember?) so they can....'enter into the sun globe, which is so powerful and dazzling?' Basically the trade off demands life for a blast of powerful and dazzling sunburn.
A sun globe that hurtles across the sky, demons with red hair and pointed nails, giant eagles laying giant eggs, omniscient omnipotent and omnipresent mystics, gigantic mango trees dropping fruit that mouth rivers of nectar, flower airplanes as big as cities (how big are the airports?) The list goes on and on. My God is bigger than yours. Ecclesiastic fantastic. Gaudiyawood in competition with Bollywood and Hollywood. This is what 'personalism' is all about: having knowledge of God's creation on unexplored planets in far away universes; knowledge given by guru given by God. How else would anyone know such details unless close up and personal with the Boss? And the aspiring cultist is expected to believe, affirm and propagate this twaddle. Otherwise everyone else is bogus, in illusion, inimical, impersonal, mayavad, less intelligent, kanistha, karmi...demon.
At this point he did not know that Krsna had already killed them before their coming into the battlefiels and that he was only to become an instrument for Krsna.....[...]...The Lord can excuse a person on His own account, but He excuses no one who has done harm to His devotees.
Arjun did not know that Krishna had already killed them, but guru does. Gaudiya interpolated gibberish.
Taking assets off a dead body and utilizing the same in "God's service" is morally easier than diddling a live one. As the quote above suggests, if one accepts that Krsna (God) has already killed, everything else is simply academic. Since everyone is separated from death by time..God (BG aii 9/19) targets are already killed, so frisking folk for cash and valuables to use in "guru's service" (guru-equals-god) can hardly be considered stealing. The second half of the quote above assures all protection to any hustling cultist with doubts.
How 'devotional service' is presented to condone trickery and deception should not go by unnoticed. Here is an example of the philosophy in practice:
Devotee (to Bhavananda Goswami "Visnupada"): I have difficulty taking money off elderly people. They appear fragile and more in need than us.
Bhavananda: That is sentiment nonsense! Money is like a gun to the karmis (materialists.) If we do not take it away from them they will use it to blow out their own brains. Take it ALL away and use it in Krsna's (guru-equals-god) service. At least they will gain some spiritual benefit from that.
According to Vedic injunctions there are six kinds of aggressors: 1) a poison giver, 2) one who sets fire to the house, 3) one who attacks with deadly weapons, 4) one who plunders riches, 5) one who occupies another's land, and 6) one who kidnaps a wife. Such aggressors are at once to be killed, and no sin is incurred by killing such aggressors. Such killing of aggressors is quite befitting for any ordinary man.
Here we see an exhibition of guru is god. Where is the respect for Law, its officers, governors, and the constitutional rights of men? A.C.Bhaktivedanta gives sanction to execute at once. Not only does he give the power of execution to any ordinary man but assures the killer that no sin is incurred as a consequence. Does guru think he is god? Are the Russians right or wrong in attempting to ban this translation? Will the Indian Government eventually see the truth and denounce this cult?
Although Arjuna was a ksatriya, he was deviating from his prescribed duties by declining to fight. This act of cowardice is described as befitting the non-Arayan. Such deviation from duty does not help one in the progress of spiritual life, nor does it even give one the opportunity to become famous in this world.
Here guru-equals-god corkscrews the pre-battle discourse between Krishna and Arjun to suggest cowardice spiritual failure and wasted opportunity to become famous due to deviating from 'prescribed duties.' This is a tired and easily identifiable psycho-shackle used to whip and tether the cult ass. When guru-equals- god 'prescribed duties' are his prerogative, and every ass must comply (make guru-god famous by propagating his cult and peddling his blah for donations) otherwise the donkey will fail to achieve spiritual emancipation....gopi sex with Krishna?
Therefore such magnanimity or so-called non-violence should be given up by persons like Arjuna under the direct guidance of Krsna.
Only a blind and deaf simpleton would, after reading this dictate, deny confirmation of our previous analysis. It is obvious how comparisons are being drawn to leg-iron and enslave persons like Arjun, who is....anyone open to suggestion, clarification or instruction.
He was truly virtuous, as these qualities, combined with his faith in the words of instruction of Sri Krsna (his spiritual master), indicate. It is concluded that Arjuna was quite fit for liberation. Unless the senses are controlled, there is no chance of elevation to the platform of knowledge, and without knowledge and devotion there is no chance of liberation. Arjuna was competent in all these attributes, over and above his enormous attributes in his material relationships.
Do you see it in brackets? Krishna equals spiritual master reversely guru-equals-god. Q.E.D!
Advising that one control the senses is unnecessary. However it is effective as reverse psychology when suggesting independent control while deliberating enslavement. We are all bound by civility, intelligence and consciousness to function in accordance with laws that bind us. However, when power over thought, action and life itself is surrendered to a guru-equals-god who uses enlightenment as a lure (what's new), enslavement is the result, whether intended/accepted or not.
In every step there is perplexity, and therefore it behooves one to approach a bona fide spiritual master who can give one proper guidance for executing the purpose of life.
And we agree. As already admitted in prior analyses, approaching any guru-equals-god, spiritual master, could behoove one. Asses grow hooves.
.....All Vedic literatures advise us to approach a bona fide spiritual master to get free from the perplexities of life which happen without our desire...
Buyer beware! "Vedic literatures" as defined by any gaudiya connection, should be taken with a pinch of salt. They, as we have briefly outlined, will say anything to promote an agenda. Anyway, we are extremely interested in scriptures outside Bhaktisiddhanta/Bhaktivedanta's Iskcon, identifying gurus as anything more than preceptors.
.....one must approach a spiritual master who is in the disciplic succession......
What disciplic succession is ACBS referring to? His guru took initiation in a dream and then gave himself sannyas initiation when seated before a mirror. It caused the break-up of his mutt. His guru's father- Bhaktivinod, was rejected by his guru (Bipin Bihari) for serious fabrication of evidence and denounced by his own gaudiya clan and the babajis of Vrindavan. Otherwise gaps close to a century-and-a-half appear in the "disciplic succession". Now the disciplic succession as represented by the Iskcon cult is American controlled and a dog's breakfast.
.....On the other hand, there is the brahmana, or he who is intelligent enough to utilize this body to solve all the problems of life. .....
Which brahmana is intelligently using his body to solve the problems of life? ACBS claimed that his cult- Iskcon, was gaudiya vaisnava, superior to brahmans. Prabhupada: But if one takes to Krsna consciousness, automatically he becomes immediately a brahmana and above the brahmanas. A Vaisnava is above the brahmanas." (Lecture on Bg. 3.18-30: Los Angeles, 30 December 1968.) Do we need to reiterate the history of filth and grime recorded and acknowledged by Iskcon's "Vaisnavas above the brahmanas" ? When Iskcon's 'vaisnava gurus' are sexually abusing children and having anal intercourse with disciples even after fifty years of surrender to a guru-equals-god, how can an inferior brahmana, by comparison, be of any spiritual benefit to himself or the world? It is time to put these outdated gaudiya goolgoolas in the garbage.
....The krpanas, or miserly persons, waste their time in being overly affectionate for family, society, country, etc., in the material conception of life. One is often attached to family life, namely to wife, children and other members, on the basis of "skin disease." The krpana thinks that he is able to protect his family members from death; or the krpana thinks that his family or society can save him from the verge of death. Such family attachment can be found even in the lower animals who take care of children also.....
We cannot speak for the rest of the world, but the derogatory comparison above has not bypassed protectors of citizens, family traditions and customs in Hindustan. What we see is a wrangling and droving aimed at isolating targets, thereby creating an emotional vacuum which can then be filled by dependency on guru-equals-god and his cult. Parental investment in their child's upbringing is cast aside in the snatch-and-grab of greedy cult dictators. However, not everyone is torn away and herded indiscriminately. Victims related to wealthy families are encouraged to "give association" to relatives, who are also given VIP status with a view to their spiritual betterment, which translates as "devotional service" or bankrolling guru-equals-god with donations.
Although Arjuna was putting forward so many arguments based on knowledge of the principles of religion and moral codes, it appears that he was unable to solve his real problem without the help of the spiritual master,.....
Unequivocally, the implications are: Arjun, a Kuru prince and exemplary achiever who was undoubtedly more knowledgeable than your average Einstein, knew squat by comparison to a "spiritual master" guru-equals-god gaudiya-goolgola. It must make every prospective Iskcon gopi wonder- " Am I my guru's finest ass?"
....Academic knowledge, scholarship, high position, etc., are all useless in solving the problems of life; help can only be given by a spiritual master like Krsna. Therefore, the conclusion is that a spiritual master who is one hundred percent Krsna conscious is the bona fide spiritual master, for he can solve the problems of life. .....
Who then is this spiritual master like Krishna? We have already answered the question previously where it was said the author- A.C.Bhaktivedanta Prabhupada proclaimed just prior to his death that no one had any brains to manage his cult. So who is the- spiritual master like Krsna that he refers to? You have one guess. That's right, it is the author himself....guru-equals-god.
..."A scholarly brahmana, expert in all subjects of Vedic knowledge, is unfit to become a spiritual master without being a Vaisnava, or expert in the science of Krsna consciousness.....
Okay so now we understand this elevated position of the gaudiya vaisnava- higher than a brahmana- spiritual master. Let us once again revisit the quotes made by him which reveal his expertize in the science of Krsna consciousness......
"Come on, here is vagina, open. This is their standard of happiness."...."The same woman, same vagina, and that is their pleasure. Bas.".... "So the human society is like that. They're smelling the vagina of the girls, that's all. Everyone is doing that."..... "You require vagina; take one vagina. Be satisfied. And lick it." "All right, you are attached to vagina-licking. Do it up to fifty years. Then give it up." ...."You are so much accustomed to the vagina-licking business-up to fifty years, so long you are young. Then give it... Don't do it anymore."...."Women are less intelligent" ...."Women are nine times more lusty than men"...."It is a fact that they (men) did not go to the moon"...."The moon is further away than the sun. It is a heavenly planet with rivers of nectar."...."Free woman means prostitute."....."One can train pigeons to carry one into outer space."...."A woman given freedom means a prostitute."..."Giant eagles fly from one planet to another, and while flying they lay eggs."...." And free woman means this, daily, new friend (sexual partner.)"...."The sun goes around the earth, not vice-versa."..."Thus the sun-god travels through the universe for a distance of 95,100,000 yojanas (760,800,000 miles) at a speed of 16,004 miles at every moment....."In Africa there is a class of men who make a festival of killing their great grandfathers."..."The unmarried girls, they keep dog for sex...[...]...You will find very beautiful girl is keeping very big dog. They are trained to have sex life. And that is cause of syphilis"...."When I was going to walk in the park in Brooklyn, the young girls are bringing dogs, big, big dogs...[...]...That means that she has got syphilitic poison".
There's a whole lot more. if you are further interested in this guru-equals-god science of Krisna consciousness please click here- Elephant in the Room.
...."But a person born in a family of a lower caste can become a spiritual master if he is a Vaisnava, or Krsna conscious." .......
As we have pointed out previously- "Anyone can be guru" and "guru- equals-god" were the two cult carrots offered to American hippies by A.C.Bhaktivedanta to a) attract conversions and b) smother past gaudiya history. Undeniably the offer sounds magnanimous and with huge potential, but it has opened a Pandora's box on two fronts, 1) an American goon-guru-gang of entrenched sociopaths, and 2) their protection via gaudiya interpolated scripture- "Even if one commits the most abominable action, if he is engaged in devotional service, he is to be considered saintly because he is properly situated." (Bg 9/30). Guru-equals-Don?
"They are seeking peace in different ways, but they can achieve real happiness only if they consult Krsna,....
The only way this can be interpreted is to consult guru-equals-god through dogma and dictum....
.....or the Bhagavad-gita and Srimad-Bhagavatam--which constitute the science of Krsna--.
Exactly! Both these gaudiya interpolated scriptures (with purports by A.C.Bhaktivedant) tell you the same thing...consult guru-equals-god and subscribe to his fame adoration and profits.
....or the bona fide representative of Krsna, the man in Krsna consciousness.....
Well....? Are we on the money or what?
"Therefore, if we want to curb lamentation for good, then we have to take shelter of Krsna, as Arjuna is seeking to do......"
Again, take shelter of Krishna has been clarified by the author on several occasions and through his writings to translate as- guru-equals-god.
Although Arjuna was for the time being overwhelmed with false grief due to family affection, he surrendered unto Krsna, the supreme spiritual master, as a disciple. This indicated that he would soon be free from the false lamentation resulting from family affection and would be enlightened with perfect knowledge of self-realization,....
To 'detach' a prospective target from family affiliations is tantamount to entrapment and enslavement which enforces the potency of indoctrination and the success of sociopath/guru and cult. We have made our point. Now that the tube is visible, readers may pick up any book written by A. C. Bhaktivedanta and note the drip continue in the same vein. There is no reason to abide here further other than to bring scores up to date and conclude.
With the death of Iskcon's founder- A.C. Bhaktivedanta, the legacy of guru-equals-god left an abyss of confusion. He appointed a Governing Body Commission to run the cult's office and anointed eleven Americans to continue with initiations. The eleven chosen initiators, citing writings lectures and tradition, claimed to be guru-equals-god, the promised legacy of A.C.Bhaktivedanta. No one challenged the legacy until the chosen, who were all young men (unlike their aged, sexually impotent guru) reverted to (hyper and perverted) sexual activity. The magical cure-all maha-mantra passed on by gaudiya goolgolas who claimed Caitanya delivered it to save souls (albeit there is no proof of Caitanya ever chanting this mantra,) failed to curb their twisted sex desires. Once the chosen anointed were caught with their pants down, with children, with disciples- (men and women,) and in a confederacy to cover up the perversions and multiplicity of criminal activities, the rabble roused and brayed, as they continue today; challenging unsuccessfully the given...possession is nine tenths the law.
In reply and defense, the fallen guru-equals-god inheritors offered up in evidence what is now commonly identified as the "May 28th Appointment Tape". We will leave our readers with a transcription of the tape and the last bastion of gaudiya 'parampara' that sustained itself by insulting Shri Krishna, Hindustan and its proud people, and continued through the years to cheat lie and slither to promote its agenda. See if you can make sense of this garbled gaudiya coronation. We, like most other straight thinkers have not been able to make hide nor hair of it in thirty-four years.
Thank You for spending time with us
Satsvarupa: Then our next question concerns initiations in the future, particularly at that time when you are no longer with us. We want to know how first and second initiations would be conducted.
Srila Prabhupada: Yes. I shall recommend some of you. After this is settled up. I shall recommend some of you to act as officiating acarya.
Tamal Krsna: Is that called ritvik acarya?
Srila Prabhupada: Ritvik . Yes.
Satsvarupa: What is the relationship of that person who gives the initiation and ...
Srila Prabhupada: He's guru. He's guru.
Satsvarupa: But he does it on your behalf.
Srila Prabhupada: Yes. That is formality. Because in my presence one should not become guru, so on my behalf. On my order, amara ajnaya guru hana, be actually guru. But by my order.
Satsvarupa: So they may be considered your disciples?
Srila Prabhupada: Yes, they are disciples, but consider ... who
Tamal Krsna: No. He is asking that these ritvik acaryas, they are offciating, giving diksa, their ... the people who they give diksa to, whose disciples are they?
Srila Prabhupada: They are his disciples.
Tamal Krsna: They are his disciples.
Srila Prabhupada: Who is initiating ... his grand disciple ...
Satsvarupa: Then we have a question concerning ...
Srila Prabhupada: When I order you become guru, he becomes regular guru. That's all. He becomes disciple of my disciple. Just see.
(Room Conversation, May 28th 1977)