30th May. 2012
Jurisdictions of law, its ambit, has been advanced through centuries of amelioration. Legal process, above all else, demands adherence to res judicata: research and analysis required to determine what the law is in a given situation. A compilation of evidence and ascertainment of the same, is only the first step in process dependant on precedents: statutes and prior case studies. Further, an extraction of principles, analogies, judicial assessments and statements made by various courts are of relative consequence to legal conclusions. To an end, adjudicators note all follow-up decisions determining how higher courts or legislatures would rule on a similar case given the facts. With all lines ruled, reasons given, parallels drawn, and integrations made, laws are applied accordingly to reach a verdict.
Holding powers of justice and wielding it is the responsibility of the legally learned, involving a lifetime of dedication and consultation. Even so, and evolved as the judicial process may be, administrators are avowed to guidelines and open to censure when failing to honor precedents. So heavily bounded is the legal arena that a trial court judge cannot venture outside the parameters (precedents) set by an appellate court, even if s/he intuits a 'bad law' in application. The Latin- 'Stare decisis et non quieta movere' (stand by decisions and not disturb the undisturbed,) cements the groundwork for legal procedure: meting equal justice sui juris.
One Finger of the Law
Every nation is governed by a compilation of legislation: a proclamation of citizen's rights. Citizen's wrongs are determined under its corpus juris (body of law.) Some may disagree with legislated laws, governance, and/or the judicial system. For such grievances provisions exist in recourse, appeal and review. These are house rules for democracy: a system of governance by the people for the people; a freedom wrested from the heavy-handed god-on-earth autocrats of old. Yet there are those who still have dictatorial aspirations. Such god-men, disabled by evolved governance, find crawl space in a democracy facilitating non-secularism. There, under myth, propaganda halos, and government granted liberty to financially self-access, cult dictators amass tin-pot armies, adopt their own laws, and grow pompous on begging-bowl wealth.
Unlike revolutionaries who risk life and limb to establish dictatorships, godmen slither on scaly covenants, expanding unchecked into every sector of society while remaining constant in a gnawing dissention of democracy (demoncrazy.) Ironically, cults point at god and mumbo-jumbo philosophy to carp the only system of governance permitting them room to germinate, e.g., prior to Russia's demokratizatsiya no cult existed, now they proliferate like vermin. Quaeitur : Why are there no soul-saving pick-pockets in North Korea?
Rockethead to Godhead from N Korea
Outrageously criminal in its short history, and characteristically so in its dictatorial policies, no cult is more adept at flying under legal radar than the epitome of begging-bowl-banditry- the INTERNATIONAL Society for Krishna Consciousness (ISKCON,) a.k.a Hare Krishnas, a.k.a Iskcon Gaudiya Mutt (IGM,).... registered in New York (1966,) under- Founder Acharya, A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada (acBSp,) who, aided by American editors, brandished his name on un-copyrighted works of Indian fablers to promote his commentaries as ancient scripture; establishing himself internally as equal to god and his IGM cult as eleemosynary- sua sponte tax-exempt. Comical if it were funny, this group claims its founder's purports to be 'law books for the next 10, 000 years'.
Rockethead to Godhead from N Korea
A scanty log of IGM criminality, both adjudicated and alleged, is visible on this site- www.b-i-f-com- as on several others. In challenging advocates of the devil, crime within the cult is legally retroactive and ongoing. Current IGM criminal cases in the news involve, as it always has, the highest echelons of spirito/management:- a) Jayapataka Swami (guru,) cited in a rape case, b) Bhakti Caru Swami (guru,) involved in an Indian Government land/money scam, now in the hands of the Lokayukta, M.P, India, c) Gopal Krishna Goswami (guru,) embroiled in an homosexual investigation, Delhi, UP, d) Prabhavishnu Swami (guru,) recently confessed to expending donations on Bangkok prostitutes, e) Paramgati Swami (guru) exposed- sexual encounters with male disciples, f) Umapati Swami (guru,) admitted to sexual episodes with at least seven of his male Chinese disciples. g) Indradyumna Swami (guru) has been ousted for his vast photo..graphic collection of semi-nude little girls. The list is active, in continuum....since the cult's conception.
Quaeitur- how does a monster look human....maintain credibility....feed and grow for forty-six years....unrestricted, while believing itself a universal bender and shaker...god's chosen? To answer the question one must delve into the realms of unconscionable sociopathy where denunciation, surrender, allegiance and compliance are strictures closely monitored to assure loyalty beyond norms, legal, civil, or humane. Recognizing the IGM's unhindered growth in crawlspace bounded by cult canon, ergo obscured from legal purview, we at BIF, who have been part of and observing the movement since encountering its founder (acBSp) in 1971, frame his dictatorial aspirations as cause and effect.
Structurally, the cult roots in the sanguine sands of sentiment. Beginning with acBSp himself, and on to his pot-grown Hibernians, the elements of crime and confusion remain constant, propped up on all sides by oaths and promises of eternal bliss. From the very beginning criminality was obvious when acBSp translated the works of Indian writers and appropriated them as- 'my books.' He claimed the system he introduced to be 'disciplic,' then foisted a package of deity & hymns dedicated to himself and installed his worship in every temple. Yes, a deity of himself. A practice unheard of prior to acBSp the begging-bowl dictator.
When asked how initiations should continue after his departure acBSp was vague. He mumbled something about appointed men initiating on his behalf. Even in death he did not want to let go. Besides, and evidentially, his 'disciplic' example did not show him dancing and singing to a made-in-Asia idol of his teacher or initiating on his behalf. As a result of his hypocrisies the IGM is a segregation of sociopathic devas and servile doormats. But is that the only reason or is there some nunc pro tunc effective retroactivity? Let's take a look.
Archaic preceptors of gaudiya cultism, confronting crime ejusdem generis, understood the facility and scope hierarchical organizations offer sociopaths. The fact that early anti-behaviorists loomed the covers of cult camouflage, is not a recent discovery.* Acting on evidenced immorality, sect perverts ventured philosophically and psychologically to justify crime and protect the head : preserve the fish from rot. To this end, Indian scriptures, under which 'disciplic' sociopaths masked themselves, were interpolated. India's Bhagavad Gita, of which there are now several versions, has the supreme moralist Shri Krishna saying:- "Even if one commits the most aboninable action, if he is engaged in devotional service, he is to be considered saintly because he is properly situated." (Bg. As it is, 9/30)....Henceforward referred to as... Bg. Law.
*Thus when the laity became bereft of knowledge, the popes who had read a little of the ritual became haughty, they combined together and declared before the kings and others in authority that it was unlawful to punish a Braahman or a Sadhu, and such texts declared "let no Braahman be killed". Braahman and Sadhu, was applied to themselves by the popes. They also wrote books containing false statements whose authorship they attributed to the great sages and seers of the past in order to stamp them with authority.
When Shri Krishna (god,) forgives sua sponte 'the most abominable action',.... every criminal has found his Vaikuntha. All that remains is for sociopathic dictators to define the ambit of cult law, e.g., "But when the guru departs, sadhu and sastra can take on a new import, as those who succeed him become the new interpreters of past precedents, scriptural law, and the new set of circumstances". (TKG- HKSMU p297).
FYI. TKG- an acronym for Tamal Krishna Goswami (late,) asBSp's secretary; the man who allegedly poisoned acBSp to death.....but remained protected under Bg. Law in spite of prima facie evidence warranting further investigation.
With god's consent, and dictatorial rights established, all that remained was to barricade the brotherhood of 'disciplic' sociopaths from secular intervention, a simple matter of internal legislation:- Law No: 12.8 " Resolved that when a person becomes a member of ISKCON or assumes an office within ISKCON, he does so upon the condition of submission to the ecclesiastical jurisdiction of ISKCON; and however much he may be dissatisfied with the exercise of that jurisdiction, he shall refrain from invoking the supervisory power of a civil court but shall seek redress of any grievance(s) through the ISKCON judicial process. Otherwise, he may be removed from office and/or his membership in ISKCON terminated, (88)".
So what comes out the end, no matter how altered in appearance, was introduced in the beginning: an inherent disregard for elected legislators, law, or enforcers-
acBSp: So they, the government, they'll be rogues and thieves...[...]...Organized burglars, organized gundas.acBSP: We don't very much like this so-called democracy. What is the value of this democracy? All fools and rascals. They vote for another fool and rascal and he becomes prime minister, or this or that. That is not good for the people. We are not for this so-called democracy because they are not trained."
acBSp: I have never given vote. Since we have got this sva-raj, Indian independence, as soon as the vote question comes up, I go away. I think, Why shall I give this nonsense person my vote. None of them are liked by me. So I avoid it. I don't believe in it.
acBSp: I like this position, dictatorship. Personally I like this.
acBSp: So we can bring in such dictatorship, provided that dictator is perfectly Krsna conscious.
acBSp: Dictatorship can be good provided the dictator is spiritually developed.
Unknown to a secular world, acBSp cult adherents dance ceaselessly to a symphony in requiem: "For ten thousand years my books will guide the world"... "Prabhupada's books are the law books for the next 10,000 years"...."The golden age of Krsna consciousness".... ..."That is also stated, that for ten thousand years Krsna consciousness movement will increase."...."Yes. You'll get the government." All of which prompts analytical research to ground legislature in a cult predicting world domination over the next 10,000 years.
Yes. You'll get the government.
What becomes quickly apparent is that the books have no 'body of law' per se. Other than believe-it-or-not spiritual fiction followed by interspaced verbosity (purports) of a cult dictator, there is no listed body of law. Contrarily, when delving into the taped recordings labeled "Conversations" (available from cult archives,) it becomes clear that acBSp could/would/should have been arraigned by the Indian Government had they known of him and his criminal incitings. Polygamy, pedophilia, homosexuality, degradation of women inter alia, are considered crimes in many countries, and most certainly in India, the dictator's homeland. Furthermore, being privy to and withholding evidence of a crime is actionable- misprision of a felony. We will show proof below, where acBSp and his honchos stand guilty as charged.
Polygamy is illegal. AcBSp condoned it because he believed Bopadev's (11 CE) account of ksatriyas with harems and Krishna marrying 16,108 women with whom he had 11 children...each! AcBSp practiced pedophilia because he believed Bopadev's wet-dream fantasies of Krishna having sexual intercourse with underaged girls. AcBSp permitted the degradation of women because he believed in Bopadev's misogyny: his account of Devahuti's abracadabra husband Kadamba Muni, expanding himself nine times because she craved a "ten some" orgy (for many, many years) to satisfy her insatiable sex desire. Here it is:-
"After coming back to his hermitage, he divided himself into nine personalities just to give pleasure to Devahuti, the daughter of Manu, who was eager for sex life. In that way he enjoyed with her for many, many years, which passed just like a moment." (SB. 3.23.44)
And here is an excerpt from the pedophile acBSp's purport on the pedophile Bopadev's implications that Devahuti, like all women, was a nymphomaniac (note acBSp's opinion underlined below) who needed a gangbang to get her kicks. Or is it self-therapy: degrading women to justify the molestation of children?*
".....in order to satisfy her sexual desire, Kardama Muni expanded himself into nine forms. Instead of one, he became nine, and nine persons had sexual intercourse with Devahuti for many, many years. It is understood that the sexual appetite of a woman is nine times greater than that of a man. That is clearly indicated here. Otherwise, Kardama Muni would have had no reason to expand himself into nine." Surely, without his own lusty desire Kadamba could not have expanded even an inch. Further, according to acBSp's 'age of consent' Devahuti should not have been more than 10/12 years old. Nine times more lusty than a man?....A pedophile pin-up snuff dream.
* acBSp: Anyone who satisfies her desire for sex at that age becomes a great object of satisfaction. It is a psychological fact that when a woman (?) at the age of puberty meets a man and the man satisfies her sexually (10/12 year old ?) she will love that man for the rest of her life, regardless who he is.
Additionally, homosexuality/pedophilia past and present within the cult, its practice and acceptance sotto voce, cannot be gainsaid in lieu of gaudiya/vaisnava history as revealed in our article GENDER BENDER DESCENDER.
In dearth of corpus juris or any visible law books for the next 10,000 years, or even an Abstract of judgment, researchers are forced to dig into archived 'incidental fragments' to determine legal jurisdiction and adjudication. Bearing this in mind, BIF brings to view three cases smothered by the acBSp junta and its Bg. Law, the only visible law in its otherwise invisible body of law...for the next 10,000 years.
acBSp Street Peddler
CASE ONE (Underline and Bold by BIF) :
Dear Prabhus, My name is Bhagavat Das. I am twice initiated by Srila Prabhupada and I have been around since 1970. My wife Radha and I were licensed foster parents for 9 years. We took care of close to 70 children in our home during that time, many of them physically and sexually abused. My experience with these children as protector, counselor, and guide has put me in a position of understanding to some extent the plight of the Gurukulis. I deeply sympathize with their dissatisfaction with the way ISKCON has handled their situation. If the leaders of ISKCON would follow the first example Srila Prabhupada set for them in dealing with child molesters they would, at the very least, make an important statement to the children that they did not tolerate child abuse.
Ah, this is interesting. A view into the courtroom of the man who authored law books for the next 10,000 years. So then, what was the precedent set by this godman who superseded all commandments and all world accepted legislation when dealing with child molesters ?.......
I was in Allahabad in January 1977 when Srila Prabhupada was at the Kumbha Mela. During that time one of the first known child molesters was caught in Vrndavana and brought to Allahabad to be judged by Srila Prabhupada. Srila Prabhupada curled his lips in disgust and shook his head in great disbelief as he was told how this disciple of his sexually molested practically every child in the Gurukula. Srila Prabhupada was so disgusted that he told the GBC and others who were in the room that this boy, on his order should never for any reason be allowed in any of our temples ever again.
That's it !!? A pedophile infiltrates a school run by acBSp then sexually molested practically every child, and cult law tells him to walk... go molest somewhere else? Without notifying law enforcement (misprision of a felony) or informing parents that children were raped, acBSp releases a monster in the playground. And his sentence..."Don't come here no more." Is this law to supersede all other legislation, and for the next 10,000 years? Let's see what else flew over the cuckoo's nest.
When questioned about the severity of the sentence Srila Prabhupada said on occasion the boy could come to a temple for the Sunday feast and eat prasadam. Unfortunately, after Srila Prabhupada left this child molester found his way back into ISKCON'S temples. I would always complain whenever I saw him somewhere but usually to no avail. "He is doing service prabhu" is what I was told as the authorities disregarded the words of Srila Prabhupada. I finally told some grown up Gurukulis the story in Alachua and the next time he came around he was warned to leave ISKCON and never return or else. I heard recently he is in ISKCON temples in India, some things never change.
Severity of the sentence? What severity? Who gave acBSp the right to withhold evidence on a serial CSA needing medical assessment and treatment? Who gave him license to hold court without education, jurisdiction and in breach of international law? Who gave him right to withhold information from parents, shutting them out from seeking their own course of action? AcBSp acted surreptitiously for gain and to maintain his own status quo, in breach of law, in breach of human civility.
The children were stolen away by the asBSp dictatorship,* as were the lives of all who fell haplessly under his driven ambition. Covering-up serious crime to secure his dream of world domination is what set the precedent for pedophilia in Iskcon, finally exposed in the Dallas Court House and only after victims reached adulthood and fought for themselves. Even so, justice was thwarted because, as disclosed earlier, the cult is rooted in sentiment. Although the number of victims were staggering, there were no ex parte claims; claimants were corralled; several victims did not come forward, and those who did were philosophically cheated by cult advocates and holy peer-pressure sentiments.
*acBSp: "If you take charge of the children of our devotees and give them nice education strictly on Krishna Consciousness principles, it will be a great help to the preachers (who street-peddled his book,) just like our six students, husbands and wives, who are preaching in London. One of them has got a child and as soon as she is at least two years old, she may be sent under your care." http://mysite.verizon.net/vze4x2q7/id5.html
Evidenced above, the cult reporter, like his fellow members, besotted and looted of decency by the godman/dictator, sees no civil obligation in notifying the law to apprehend a dangerous predator who sexually molested practically every child . To the cultist, the dictator/godman is god-on-earth. No matter how garbled his philosophy or criminal his activity, his every pubic hair is a worshipable relic.
CASE TWO (Underline, Bold, and comments (in blue) by BIF) :
>>> Ref. VedaBase => Room Conversation June 26, 1975, Los Angeles